Following are two photos of the drawings I submitted for Exercise 2. What kinds of drawings they are should be fairly self-explanitory, so the images probably only beg a relatively shallow description of the concepts behind them.
An idea I'm looking into in the design is that of the cliff face meeting at the threshold of land and sea for much of the coastline, which is in a formal way partially isomorphic to the "cliff" created by sheer building facades facing out to sea around the Coogee community centre's site. Cliffs are a powerful presence, and are solid surfaces only ever really "punctured" by nature to form caves and interesting niches.
I'm planning to have a relatively light, transparent building sit beside the massive, rock-like "cliff" building. Aesthetically, it provides a strong contrast to the "cliff" building, and also somewhat (in designs successive to the drawing) embodies the natural forces and "directions" that punch and jab through such seemingly impenetrable natural bodies over time. However, in the drawings pictured below, I had not yet entirely established or developed that idea. This is why the "transparent" building is just sitting there meaninglessly - or, at least, without any intentional meaning of sufficient worthiness to me. In later designs, it spans through and punctures the powerful surfaces formed by the "cliff" building for a design that more successfully integrates the two buildings rather than slamming them irreverently (even thoughtlessly) into the site next to one another.
Another idea that was presented to me by my tutor was that I differentiate more thoughtfully between conceptually distinct forms and spaces, rather than simply making them mostly from concrete. To this end, I am currently testing some of the new designs with respect to incorporating different materials - wood, glass, sandstone - and experimenting with their effects.
